Now if you folks are only seeing the current state of things, their mannerism, their value systems, their contradictions, supportive words.

You are looking into their adapatations held in fear of punishment.

 

When a crime is done, and the criminal changes his attitude in the court,

is the crime dismissed?

 

What counts is the severity of their actions at the height of the crime.

What is stated.

 

No contradictions matter after insane duration, and repeating itself.

 

So what you must look into, is their writing,

their statements from prior, when all that crime was being held.

 

Not the other way around.

 

 

If everyone can get away with what they've done, just because they start being nice.

 

I don't think so.

 

It's because YOU decide to keep it in the realm of an "opinion". But it is beyond that. Isn't it?

 

Violence, theft, mugging, slander, prejudice, bias, defamation, humiliation.

Intent of harm, in its variations, in all that duration, stalking, and targeting in the mass.

IS EVIDENT.