Reading again "Baldur and invulnerability"

 

 

Initiating, by prejudice. Gay slurs, threats to subjugate.

Installation of fear. Stalking me to Walmart in the midst of this,

fully expecting subjugation. While theft.

 

The point here is using "prejudice to violence" therefore, "prejudice to subjugate".

by installation of fear.

 

And when this didn't work,

 

It went on pursuit of social subjugation by its control.

 

Taking that same element of prejudice/bias, in order to affect my life.

 

What is in accordance to the law,

 

"prejudice/bias on sexual orientation"

 

and exploitation of this,

 

by usage of violence, to install fear, to subjugate,

 

theft.

 

slander.

 

humiliation.

 

defamation.

 

without remorse.

 

How can this person be invulnerable to his crimes?

 

 

Without him, none of it would have happened.

 

 

He is the origin.

 

 

 

If I wasn't able to defend myself. What would have happened? Theft. Destruction of my career/future.

 

And even as I defend myself, damage will be present, pursuit of harm.

 

How many times did it do this, on pursuit of destruction of my prospects?

 

It shows no remorse.

 

 

This was done in the mass. Not just any random mass.

 

But my close network. Investors, marriage (though then it will dismiss as vigilantism, which it clearly knew there is no danger in public display and explained

the situation) extended family, past, friends to the future, whomever.

 

 

It tried and trying to sabotage the entirety of my life. By humiliation, slander, defamation, theft, subjugation by violence, subjugation by prejudice.

 

To the victim, it is essentially, EVERYTHING.

 

It aimed for EVERYTHING. Not just legacy. Even the person's identity. And therefore, the prospects.

 

 

It is my life it tried to destroy. In all aspects. In many variations. And will continue to do so.

 

How is this person "invulnerable"?

 

No. It's because you are simply seeing the technicality of things, as if is just a 'speech' or 'opinion'.

 

 

It clearly has a tangible effect, outcome that is aimed. That intent of harm cannot be dismissed.

 

 

 

 

 

Apologies for repeating myself a million times.

 

 

Maybe each time, I am becoming a bit more clearer.

 

 

This time, about what it aimed at. What parts of my life.

 

 

And that the intent was clear, aiming for destruction.