Now, if you are deliberately dismissing his crimes, in order for me to fight back,

and to use that statement against me in order to turn the table around,

that in it, itself, would be a felony. I have clearly stated it is up to your decisions whatever the outcome of the punishment.

It seems that since this is a kangaroo court, with reasons of dismissal repeating itself despite having been done prior,

this could be the case. If it is, it should be decidely be understood as an act of hostility, mislead.

For why else the same reasons be used to dismiss their crimes only to turn my statements against me?

To create conflict in order to have one more shot at an attack towards me?

 

I am just a mirror. You are all basically harming yourselves, trying to exploit the situation.

You know I am only reacting to the relays, and you are trying to cherry pick something.

But whatever it is, fundamentally it is already covered. You are only repeating your harmful intent.

Unjustified insurrection. By your prejudice and forced reasoning. Your intent is clearly visible.

 

And by misleads as well. If I am not wrong about this deliberate lure, again and again.

 

 

 

I'm trying my best to take a guess at what is going on.

And if even that guess is used against me.

What is exploitation? The nature of that needs to be questioned.

Here is a person who is blind. And they well know this.

They want to create damage. When it all fairness, they should not be speaking from prejudice but equal observation and equal say. It IS insurrection by exploitation. In order to destroy.


By the way, I often speak with a confident tone, because otherwise I think i'm prone to dismissal or exploitation of some form. Nobody would take me seriously.

But honestly, sometimes it's a guess. Like these few messages.

But it doesn't mean i'm wrong. It is up to YOU to verify that because,

you see it in the open. I can't.

And just because I can't see, doesn't mean it hasn't happened. So that is all i'm doing here. Pointing out their intent in my life.

Otherwise they would fully exploit the chance and make my life worse and worse.

And they should be punished in accordance to the law.

And they can't change their say now by the way. Even after their confession, they went on pursuit of harm, and that intent must be accounted for.

Exploiting their own rights of speech, when it is actually about targeting a singular individual who is being attacked.

They are the worst kinds of people. Please recognize where they came from and what variations of harm proceeding. The nature of all this is about destruction.  

 

The common causality of their actions, all of them, are from equal grounds;

It is stemming from their delusional ego.

They have got to win.

And I don't think i'm wrong on this. Even from the third person who is not the victim.

That should be apparent to you. None of this was neccessary, if they simply decided to stop.

 

 

And that pursuit of harm, in their vanity. Knowing what is happening.

To the victim, am only seeing evil.

Done nothing. Absolutely nothing to deserve such intensity of pursuit of harm.

Destruction.