I suddenly get Mr Musk's relay and Mr Gates relay.

 

Steve was let go.

 

And this was under the assumption he could speak out

in his 'speculation'.

 

 

Then the authorities are choosing an lopsided reasoning

at his advantage.

 

 

First, I have stated my defense.

 

 

Second, there is nothing that conclusively supports

 

what he forces as facts. Therefore it is coming from

 

great prejudice and bias. Not to mention, it was

 

further amplified with slander, mocks and harassment.

 

 

That is more than enough for charges of PURSUIT.

 

 

 

If you let this go, your decisions must be questioned.

 

And this person will continue with this.

 

Even if not, nothing he did is justified.

 

 

 

See where it began, it began from a place of harm.

 

And further, placement of harm by pursuit.

 

This was clearly abuse in its highest form.

 

 

It is born by hatred, it is born by prejudice.

 

It has asserted many types of harm as well.

 

To simply let go. That would be wrong.

 

 

If not, my apologies for the speculation.

 

 

I am pressing full charges, and this person deserves

 

the law. Please also recognize that prejudice means,

 

it speculated on my sexual orientation by its own

 

reasoning. Which is evident by the facts whilst in the

 

house. And what it stated, followed by what actions

 

of delusion. Such as coming out of the room naked with

 

a grin on the face, or agreeing with his brother on

 

who I am.

 

I am far from it. I have stated this. And it still

 

went on pursuit. INFINETLY.

 

It must be punished for its actions.

 

 

Again, apologies if my speculation on he was let go is

 

wrong. If it is still in assessment.

 

 

 

I am a complete victim, since the beginning from this

 

person. And I cannot tolerate something like this to

 

continue or go without charges. Law is the law,

 

though people simply may see it as entertainment or light

 

of harm. On the receiving end, (and it must be seen

 

from the receiving end, from the point of view of the victim,

 

not the public)

 

it is something that is breaking a person in two.

 

It is the person's identity this person is diluting.

 

In an effort to persuade and create doubt.

 

And it leaves a mark in history, as you can see

from the beginning, it aimed for my legacy.

 

But the difference is not just theft. It came from

 

prejudice, belief. And it pushed this on.

 

It was a witch-hunt of which it would not hear reason.

 

Something that forces its ignorance on others for

 

the intent of harm. Must be punished in accordance

 

to the law.