Reading Mr Musk's relay here:

 

From time to time this issue is being brought up again.

As my previous statements become buried.

 

That is to manipulate the public perception trying to

change the outcome of the trial.

 

First, please bring up my writing from before.

 

I can't be wasting my time writing again and again the same thing.

 

 

 

As I stated before. This was my mom's life. I was trying to

save my mom's life. Nobody has the right to push organ donation

on us. Let's try and understand in terms of the law, though

this is clearly an lesser invasive example.

 

If a person, in his/her religious belief. Must carry out a 'ritual'

in order to save the 'soul' of their loved one as they have died.

And say some hospital staff refutes from them from doing so,

in placement of *their belief.

 

This is called a hate crime. Generative A.I can write far better than

I can, so read this:

 

 

That head nurse is a religious person. And even without that fact,

her 'preference' does not automatically turns into an authoritative assertion.

Over someone who believes is trying to SAVE THEIR LOVED ONE.

 

Do we understand this?

 

 

 

I was trying to save my mom, and they did what they can to PREVENT that from happening.

Not by any jurisdiction of the law, by their PREFERENCE.

 

Not by suggestion, not by an opinion, (both these would be tried and given up in placement of the better will of the SON TRYING TO SAVE THE PARENT)

 

BUT by authoritative REFUTE.

 

That FUCKING IMPOSSIBLE ARROGANCE.

 

 

Do we understand what kind of unconscionable things these are?

 

 

We discussed in LENGTH on the effects of the preservation.

And how not doing so would spell the outcome. Spell her fate.

And they were aware, Dr. "Sharp" even stating he believes

nanotechnology will surface in 200 years time.

 

Then we were at least in recognition that we were talking about HOPE.

That we were trying to increase her chances of survival.

 

But in placement of their prejudice, their own logic, of which

nobody is qualified to do so. THEY ENDED THIS WITH AUTHORITATIVE REFUSAL.

And as personal conviction.

 

"Well. WE. WON'T. HELP. YOU." The idiot was taking things personally.

Someone who was trying to save his mom. NOTHING more.

 

What was I trying to do? I was trying to save her life.  

My mother committed no crime. She died, and BECAUSE of the hospital.

BECAUSE of neglect of the hospital. That psychopath doctor,

and further because the hospital did not have a backup protocol

in an event the system will be exploited as that doctor has.

 

And WHILE in recognition of this, they pushed on with their BELIEF.

Their PREFERENCE.

 

Like I said. And like with any SANE people would do.

 

If one is trying to save their loved one. If that is the goal.

 

You don't make this into a discussion of GIVING UP ON HER LIFE.

 

You don't try and make that into a fucking OPTION.

 

You don't even SUGGEST this in your RIGHT FUCKING MIND.

 

That's not a option to me IS IT?

 

But these arrogant fucks, think they know BETTER.

 

 

 

We have already discussed that, practice of Cryonics is not illegal.

Only advertisement of cryonics is.

 

They could have helped us, if they choose to do so.

 

But it's not about whether to help or not.

 

It is the WAY they refused that help since the beginning.

 

With their own arrogance and authority.

 

Over basic human rights. Against another person's RIGHT.

 

 

 

Again. This is a hate crime based on their own prejudice.

 

And in matters of 'religion' as well, as it pertains hopes of life and death,

 

about hopes of revival of the person.