There really is no reason why Steve should not be punished in the now.

 

Because there was no reason why this person attempted theft,

 

attempted slander, attempted defamation in all forms,

 

to this persistence, to this incredible force of effort in order to destroy me.

 

 

There was a time, because he was being abusive with the door,

 

(as you can see on the email exchange)

 

I was mad. Because he would slam it as I slept, and would

 

quickly run away upstairs to leave the house in the morning.

 

 

Or in the middle of the night. To all of which,

 

it simply goes on gaslighting. That he didn't do it on purpose.

 

Or he never did so in the first place.

 

There is no evidence so you must drop it.

 

The best I could do, is to send an email single-way when it happens.

 

 

That same gaslighting, but persisting abuse/stalking is present

 

when it followed me to Walmart. These were during the times he was

 

attempting theft. Of which I confronted him, and he denied his efforts

 

once again.

 

 

So if I was mad, you can see why. It is menacing.

 

If I was nice, it was to dismantle these types of relentless abuse.

 

If to turn it into a friendship, then there would be no abuse.

 

But I was wrong. It continued. It's like this person gets a kick out of

 

going after another.

 

 

And no, there are no excuses to his actions. At all.

 

If I was ever mad, it was verbal,

 

and in those rare occasions I got mad (2, I believe, me yelling. I believe I once asked him to let's take it outside if he a problem with me)

 

as a REACTION to which he banged the door on purpose,

 

many times,

 

of which it resulted in my ear, then following my arm being affected.

 

Of which I have told him multiple times.

 

 

And most importantly, it was quickly dismantled, this escalation. As he denied the actions.

 

But only to repeat, again and again.

 

 

So if it had a relentless desire to harm the person, and it could not stop. (As he is now, as proven on the channel)

 

The only thing that I could do is keep sending those emails.

 

And at the same time, to build a friendship.

 

However, that in it itself quickly turned sour as well.

 

As he persisted from time to time.

 

 

 

So no, there was no reason for this person to have continued abuse. But especially as everything was in 'agreement' and if escalation, it dismantled as such.

 

For the abuse he was persisting, I retracted my offers on support of money. And that was my best retaliation to his menace.

 

You can also see there was this 'sinister' backstabbing that went on even during the times I was trying to befriend him.

 

As he took Festus to a bar and told him pointers against me I believe. In preparation to an attack, attempting theft, later on.

 

During those times, Steve was asking about the 'origins' of the idea.

 

So he was planning indeed.

 

 

 

Relentless pursuit of harm.

 

And to be honest, I was out of my wits.

 

It was just plain in sight, I could see this guy's hostility all the time.

 

So you try being friendly, and at the same time, you must exaggerate it as well even if you don't mean it. Be aware of what is going on.

 

It was kind of like a silent hostage situation. Be nice, or it'll keep going.

 

It will keep on denying abuse as it does it for fun.

 

 

 

 

So please do understand where this person is coming from.

 

 

There is no excuse for what he has done here.

 

 

I believe my expressions, in my exaggerated state, was a bit funny.

 

 

I have said something like I was "hurt" by our friendship ending, as I allocate this on the email.

 

 

And at the same time, I was rather happy I brought up his hopes only to bring it down. (20k)

 

 

Only because it wouldn't stop persisting abuse.

 

 

So there was this 'shadowy' game that went back and forth.

 

 

Gaslighting each other.

 

 

 

But 1. This is only because of his abuse that persisted in the house, it left me no choice but to retaliate with passive aggression.

 

 

2. Whatever that shadowy game was, it dismantled there in the house. Give and take, fair and square.

 

Actually, he should have been charged for that abuse, as it has affected my ear, and that was about health.

 

But there is no evidence to what it does. So what he's done is far worse. I only toyed with the idea of 'hope'.

 

And it wasn't a big hope either, only 20k. And fairly deduced to 2k, as the abuse persisted still,

 

and that 2k deduced to nothing, as another abuse (he antagonized by giving his furniture away of which he was telling me to keep,

to his brother. Changing his mind. hahaha good. That is a good retaliation) (and also the dirty dishes left there in purpose,

as he said he is giving it away)

 

These are something in-line with that give and take. So this type of retaliation is understandable.

 

 

 

3. But does that give him the right to attempt stealing series of billions of dollars of prizes?

 

Does it give him the right to engage in slander to which he stated in a homosexual relationship?(!!!!!!!)

 

Ultimately attempting defamation toward my character?

 

 

No, it does not.  

 

 

 

 

So please do understand. There is a limiter to someone's hostility.

 

This person. DOES NOT.

 

 

The typical behavior of a psychopath or a sociopath, is that when it sees a person as a target,

 

it suddenly has all the rights in the world to abuse this person. No moral justification that is needed.

 

No fair give and take. Only pushing forward its motives.

 

 

 

It was out of the bounds.

 

 

 

 

Now. I also see that, i'm afraid, that he exploits on your kindness as well.

 

 

I have seen relays that Queen Camilla dismissed Douglas's charge as "you both were terrible".

 

 

Despite all he's done has occured AFTER my apology to my initial behavior, which was also done

as a reaction.

 

 

Douglas has behavioral issues. But at least to a point, I believe he is being honest about his issues.

 

 

In case with Steve. The dimension of this hostility is different.

 

 

 

 

What I am sensing is that, the Royal family, deliberately keeps the law out of this,

 

and drags things on with these individuals. So these people have the advantage of dismantling their charges over time.

 

As it is whatever you decide to see in the end.

 

 

 

 

By logic, this person should have been incarcerated since long ago.

 

 

And to all the charges that should have been made, it was probably diminished greatly by your efforts, sadly.

 

That is my guess. I apologize if i'm wrong. But you are there to diminish the charges of these individuals,

 

as they go on pursuit of harm.

 

 

 

That shouldn't have been.

 

 

 

It is exactly that, all my rights are taken away by the States. You are half in collaboration with them in this monitoring.

 

You are half there to forgive my attackers.

 

As I myself, I am relentlessly attacked, as I am subjected to public display, the harm.

 

 

 

And I still do not understand, why (judging by the relays) that you believe we still have a deal together.

 

When you severed it.

 

 

 

That you think that i'm 'bluffing'?

 

I'm sorry if i've given you any impression that I am trying to be part of your family. I am not.

 

 

I am not interested in the throne.  

 

I will however work with Prince William in the future for the development of your countries.

 

I certainly will pay the taxes for the rewards.

 

 

But no more than this.

 

 

 

It is not a bluff, it is not a mislead.

 

 

 

Please understand that I am not interested in the throne. It was an honor.

 

But while you are believing that I am making a mistake,

 

that my reasoning in division of time and focus, there are no disadvantages.

 

Among many things.

 

 

 

I decline this offer the same.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I am not trying to antagonize the Royal family.

 

However, rules have been quite clear since the beginning.

 

 

 

It is by your... 'good will' or values in others that you took it up on my enemies personally,

 

and took lightly of my harm done. Nor was my anger recognized despite my endless attempt

 

to retaliate.

 

 

 

So your values are your own, and I respect this.

 

But I am free to go free from your binds as well.

 

 

 

Personally, I find you far too controlling, far too invasive.

 

Without even having to met someone,

 

you jeopardized a deal based on your planning, and what would happen next.

 

 

 

Despite the many times I have stated my stance.

 

You ignored all of it.

 

 

 

There is no wrong or right in this. Only wrong from my perspective.

 

Only right from your perspective. It is a crash in values.

 

 

 

I respect this.

 

 

 

And I am out.

 

 

 

As mentioned, I will work with Prince William and Princess Kate in further development

of your countries. My taxes will be paid.

 

 

 

But I do not wish to work with King Charles, or Queen Camilla.

 

Nor do I want to follow their plans.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sorry, didn't mean to repeat the writing. Accidentally copied and pasted the whole thing again.

 

 

 

 

I don't want to take your time. I wasn't misleading at all.

 

I don't understand why, despite EVERYTHING I SAID,

 

you take it as a bluff and still pushes on your will.

 

 

 

How much prejudice, or certain expectancy of character, while never even having met,

has already been decided in your minds?

 

 

And no matter how many times, I make a statement over and over again,

 

you continue to ignore my decisions?

 

 

Please understand that I am out of all this.

 

I will not be working with King Charles or Queen Camilla.

 

 

I will work with Prince William and Princess Kate in the future.