Judging by the relays, Zuckerberg gets away on this 'right'

to denial of service. Then that at least proves he's not so human

as he claims. Second, denial of service is one thing.

But deliberate criminal negligence while the harm is happening

live is another. This would be the second time since Adam.

So the law is looking at his from an wrong angle, to his advantage,

despite Adam's confession. They were together. They observed

and did nothing together but to exchange it as an business opportunity.

That sounds a lot like vanity coming from a privileged place,

knowing my own disadvantages, being in the blind.

But of course, the law will favor them instead.