And there is a suspicion, a strong suspicion,

based on everything Adam has done before,

 

that the Facebook ad hack, was done by Adam.

 

He is the former CTO of this. He would know how to navigate.

 

 

 

If so, then maybe Mark, passively knowing that it is indeed Adam,

 

that he refuses to investigate.

 

 

 

 

Whether it is Adam or not is irrelevant.

 

 

Mark should have simply went forth with the investigation that fell into his territory,

 

knowing my situation and what kind of abuse I am susceptible to.

 

 

 

 

The fact is that, they find this 'funny'. And they passively engage in abuse as well.

 

Letting things slip by like this.

 

 

And in Adam's case, there was DIRECT abuse hacking my devices,

 

monitoring and insinuating many unpleasant messages.

 

 

It was a serious behavioral problem, and my speculation on the FB ad hack,

 

to drain my funds in times of need, to deter me from productivity,

 

(He messed with my tablet connection to keep me from uploading my books

more recently)

 

If he's written something, perhaps in the educational sector, as a competitor

to Mr Bezo's investment, this would explain why.

 

So there is strong suspicion, and Adam do not know where to draw the line.

 

 

Please bring up all the instances i've spoken about Adam's behavior by

typing "Adam" in the previous messages. There were numerous to mention.

 

 

All this abuse, I am not saying Mark was involved. But he kept deliberate negligence

from a privileged place, from a place where he had control as well.