If he simply stood on the sidelines, maybe that is okay.

 

But there was involvement with Adam.

 

Fully observant of what is going on, then dealing into business, investment.

 

Then was it an 'exchange' for my suffering?

 

If all that was going on, why didn't he prompt Adam to work with the police

during those times? He knew Adam was on charge of what is being displayed.

 

 

If there were authorities there, those are unrelated to the cyber-bullying.

 

 

It was their moral obligation to proceed. They held the key (incoming data)

from Anna.

 

 

As is with the hacking that went on in Facebook. No investigation is on pursuit,

no refund made, despite seeing my situation, vulnerable in public display.

 

 

So what 'human' factor are we seeing here?

 

 

 

Deliberate negligence. When they should be absolutely involved.

 

As they held the key. (Data) and full control over the environment.

 

 

 

So what excuse can be said in replacement to this?

 

 

 

If Adam admitted to his wrong, that same responsibility falls to Mark as well.

 

Minus the abuse that proceeded with Adam.