If I can recall the last moments just prior to the fight,

I asked Douglas (after those 60 days or so) noticing the hallway harassment,

to speak to those people. I believe he had.

But it repeated.

So I told him this.

And then it happened again. (Hallway harassment)

So I told him, and he said something like "That's just..."

 

At this point, because it was repeating, I didn't believe that he's said things in a way that would make things STOP.

 

I was paranoid. What if again, someone was going to speak to me in a hostile manner?

How am I to eat? Going to the cafeteria?

 

So I decided to go downstairs to the 'lion's den' where people converse.

If I state my case, who I am, be polite, that I have no issues with Douglas now, and the reasons why I was mad the first time, then there and then, it would be over.

I can't trust Douglas's communication then.

What I didn't EXPECT, Douglas showing this sudden dual-side on me. He was okay, in conversation with me in the room, but in front of his PEERS, he suddenly started getting angry, because I was defending myself. And he asked me to fight him, CRAZY mad, (AGITATED).

That was something completely uncalled for. Not in-line to what I was expecting or, conversing, with Douglas. It is as if my free speech must be suppressed while he himself, can speak, however he wishes.

And like an idiot, thinking he can't be REALLY that mad, (over what, really, just because I am stating my defense) I accepted the fight (only to retract it in some variations).

But there was no reconciliation. He pushed on with violence. And you know the rest.

 

And the fact that this guy is delusional enough to think that he has the right to think of ME as the bully. When he was the cause and effect of all this, and what's worse, still doing this. Triggering, conerning, threatening the person, because he can't control himself.

It was very difficult to prove his hostility in the beginning. But at this point, i'm sure his 'ways' are far more self-centered then you may have previously believed. You've seen all the times he was taunting me online, on-pursuit.

That is how it is. I can't trust this guy with any consistency of integrity. He does what he wants, adaptive in that moment.

Violence never should have been included in that setting, or continued as FROM our previous talk. It's just he's sudden ego that rose up, trying to look a certain way to his peers.

He could always defend himself verbally, IF there is something that is 'misunderstanding',
but he wanted to suppress my say, and resolve this with violence, of which I did not know how far it was in his mind.

It was pretty far. I had no hostility like this, at all.

 

Originally, I thought Douglas was just 'acting' during those times. Getting mad, just to look tough in front of his peers. No. I was wrong. He did so out of sincerity, to feed his ego, and to antagonize me. So this was violence. Violence that is proven again on the channel. His intentions are clear. He believes he had the right some how. But that would only make him a criminal.
He does not have the right in any shape or form.