no. what was done by Anna was blatant harm,

and Adam and Mark should have stopped it then.

Recognizing this. Nothing to do with free speech.

 

that was where it began.

 

but they decided to leave it altogether.

 

what should've been filtered was not.

 

whatever was my allegation can stay to be discussed.

 

but not the initial attack done by Anna,

nor her spamming activity to expand it.

 

I was kept blind, and it went on.

 

They held no responsibility despite being

part of direct authorities of this,

access to all technical information,

rights to investigate,

moral obligation as CEOs to properly report,

the incoming data and what i've said on how it began

with Anna.

 

Their deliberate negligence to crime that's led me

to stay in the blind and harm that spread far more than it should have been.

 

There are no excuses to this, if there are evidence to the timeline in

which they began observation of this, then they should be charged for it.

 

Further, how can you possibly buy into this neglection,

deliberate neglection of the hack my FB account?

 

Even after its identification?

 

And continued harassment by Adam?

 

Their intent, making these excuses are clear.

They dilute this with my allegations,

 

but they had their own responsibilities which is seeing me attacked,

separate from this, yet they chose to keep it this way. As they are now.

 

And if as a bystander, as an audience. Maybe acceptable.

But as CEOs who had access to all technical data. cause and reasons why.

Further offering an investment towards me while videos continue on the public

display? No. That is called vanity. That is exploitation, as is now.