If there's an attempt of insurrection by Adam and Mark,

as i've briefly seen on the relays on Youtube,

or anyone else they should be charged for this.

 

I can't make up the past. Far prior to the incident.

It is based on facts. "Michael Lee" is the determining evidence of my intent.

 

Further the situational circumstance. There was no pursuit,

and asking 'permission' to a stranger just met? Was I calculating

the probability or not?

 

My memories may have been unclear in the beginning,

but those parts are now in the clear.

 

Whatever they did, they did on their own accord, far after i've left

the country. They went on pursuit.

 

Molestation happens not in the open, with a stranger.

Not when that is my employer beside, and I am living with my caretaker,

who was the former PM of that country.

 

It happens in secrecy, and if in partnership, they would have been

knowing each other for a long time. In all probability, asking

'permission' to this stranger is an expected outcome of resounding, "no".

 

Which I predicted correctly. It was simply my stupidity digging a

deeper hole to avoid having sex. (You can tell that by my life,

even until the now, having avoided sex, this is true. Over a decade later.)

 

Most importantly, if I have a past history regarding my intent, which are based on facts.

Stating "Michael Lee" and the story behind it. There is no more one can accuse.

 

What I wrote in the beginning, to Kelly.

If I can recall, I was under the impression that it was already assumed

a prank ? I can't remember clearly. I generally wrote in regret and shame

of trying to be a "pimp" for Choi, affected by pursuit of investment opportunity.

That was the only goal at the time. Not any 'molestation'. I used that

as a chance to get away from it all.

 

But if I wrote believing I had such intent. Then that is because it

is in the initial stages. My memory wasn't clear, at all.

I could be questioning myself. Why I got involved in it, and there

is no logical explanation. Either way, I remembered later on, with correct facts

I cannot possibly make up.

 

But I don't think that was it. Do try finding follow-up message after this,

cherry-picking their way into insurrection is another type of an attack.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

When I put Adam on the stand, it is completely different.

 

This wasn't addressed entirely, and buried, as he became charge of the monitoring.

As things progressed.

 

But this does not dismiss what he allowed in the channel,

in the very beginning, with Anna. These are two separate things.

 

As authorities weren't present then. Adam's intent is absolutely clear.

 

Yet it was diluted in the process because of my allegations.

They allowed monitoring, and of all the people, they decidedly used

Adam ---- on charge of this, in order to dilute his initial crime.

 

 

But again, those are two separate incidents.

 

Adam must be charged for this.