It seems Mr Musk's relays indicate that David defends himself talking about me,
as that is his perceived reality and he has the right to speak about me.

Well, not if that reality is intended to be damaging. It is polite not to talk about it.
This isn't talk between friends, but in the public. And as I am rising to certain status.

That motive is not something good.

 

Secondly, my reactions from David's actions within the household is from within the household. Offline. That he is expressive, and I believe is connecting emotions to whatever is happening on the channel. And I simply should not be affected by it. I have not misled on this, I am stating my experience, as-is. And because my ears are hurting.

 

When someone tells someone else to leave them be/alone. Don't do this and that. If it's not coming from a place of ego, but a request. They should simply listen to those wishes instead refuting it from an authoritative stance. Because that is called abuse.

 

I believe I am being absolutely clear. And I can guess how things are diluted in the channel with better intent, and completely contradicted in the offline life. Kindly pick out the bad. If the bad is bad enough, good cannot count.

The wisest option here, has always been, not getting involved. But especially when the person cannot see the channel, and blind to it.

 

I say this not to antagonize, but from a defensive stance.

 

I suspect that this kind of passive aggression will always exist, and I will have to endure it.

Why is the question on all this ego.

It shouldn't exist.