hmm... curious.

 

and apologies if i got the relays wrong,

 

but if i read it correctly, ms.greene was misleading

this whole time was still married to mr.greenfield?

 

 

if that is the case.... oh no.

that falls in the realm of breach of the law,

despite your help in other areas.

 

because the intent would be disrupt my

own prospects in relationships.

that would be the only outcome for your aim.

 

of course i am not interested in ms.greene

in that way, either way but.

still, the intent would be...

 

toying with someone.

sociopathic by nature.

 

so unfortunately,

you will be charged if that is the case.

most likely severely so.

 

...hmm. i hope not.

 

if this is a mislead, kindly stop.

the girl went through enough.

 

if it was a mislead created by ms greene.

 

yeah... that is completely sociopathic,

the intent is damage. whichever way.

 

if say, i accepted it, and she announces her prank,

then my relationship prospects would sour,

and that would be only intent.

 

for herself. that's purely evil.

 

hahaha. of course i would never be interested in that way but.

 

it is about HER intent.

 

that would be the same cruel thing she applied in high school

by the photo (even though i was oblivious to it)

 

so IF this had happened.

 

100%. she should be charged.

 

 

XD

 

if 'prank', she should be charged because it is not a spontaneous

isolated prank. it is pre-meditated and carrying on from history.

that kind of severe intentional harm is out of the bounds.

it is also the kind of cruelty existing in demented,

pervasive individuals only in the realm of relationships.

it is... something that is serious.

 

what kind of vanity attempts to toy with a person's heart after all.

of course i was never there but it is about HER intent,

displayed on the public. that is on pursuit of harm,

following high school. it is something very evil.

 

so it needs to backfire on her if that is who she is.

 

if not, my sincere apologies. i wish you better.