There's really no excuse for what Douglas did either,

other than his own self-indulgence at someone else's expense.

 

He didn't have to. Yet he pushed forward with various

expressions of violence, to building up to that violence.

 

There never was any need for it.

 

But this is how he is wired.

 

And those choices, from whatever he was thinking

had no justification.

 

Further his gloating and taunting on the channel

carries on from whatever he was at the time.

 

And he was on the channel prior to that incident,

and that is added motive.

 

If no examples are set to these types of people,

I will continue to be a target.

 

 

Please do not dismiss this, but leave it to the law.

 

By law, he and others whose attacked me on the channel

should be punished for what they are.

 

Further, it's not only me he had these behavior towards,

is it? I became absorbed into THEIR world, not the other

way around. I didn't want to be part of it.

 

There is what it is. At the least, Ontario Bill 168 applies.

 

 

 

It is not only this area towards me,

 

but he is charged for many things is he not?

 

 

The issue is this.

 

If anyone is there to solely GET IN THE WAY OF THE LAW,

 

it is better off you are not there.

 

I'm sorry to say this, but your compassion, if what the

relayers saying is true,

 

destroys balance.

 

It destroys order.

 

And therefore my life directly.

 

 

Please just leave it to the law. They should be charged for

many things, and as we agreed before,

 

not at my expense. This is my life you intervene.

 

Apologies for my assumption based on what the relayers are saying.

 

If true, you may have the right to do so with the people you've

experienced. Your enemies.

 

Not with mine.

 

This is my choice alone, and nobody, unless evidence is NOT

based on compassion, but FACTS,

 

it is justifiably wrong to intervene.

 

It is already determiend they meant harm.

 

Then the sentence should follow.