and for Meta, it doesn't matter what the technical loophole is in their terms of service.

 

*that was created to defend the company against exploitation,

not to mistreat individuals who are obviously the victim.

 

 

furthermore, the CEO himself sees that i'm in turmoil through the screen.

 

i am on goddamn public display!!!

 

 

and he STILL antagonizes me, when he can simply help the victim,

 

 

that's not in the realm of company practice is it?

 

 

 

it's personal.

 

 

 

In both realms, as an entity or an individual, it doesn't make sense NOT TO ADDRESS THIS.

 

it only reveals his damn intent to antagonize ME.

 

 

 

So he should be charged for that and give me more money for harassment.

 

 

 

XD

 

 

Seriously. At least return my money now. It's becoming a whole month, when I was refunded for the

first transaction in few days. There is absolutely no reason why he can't refund the rest.

 

This is about exploitation of power. Wrong exercise. Motive must be questioned instead citing

terms of service. Do not confuse on this.

 

 

Give me my money back Fuckerberg!!!