Reading relays on Douglas again.

 

 

Is he blaming his own actions on drugs?

 

 

No. It was carefully planned actions of passive aggression.

 

 

Stemming from how he was raised. To antagonize.

 

 

And if he's blaming me for getting very momentarily, angry.

 

(For what was his breach in agreement, and for the abuse he deliberately went on)

 

 

I mean, he said he wouldn't then he does it (release gas) out of

defiance(?) I don't know the word for it.

 

And it smelled.

 

I got up from the bed, and yelled out, "Stop! I'm gonna go crazy!"

and scrambled my hair. He jumps on the bed, intimidated.

 

I believe I apologzed, we reconciled.

 

But he does it again, this time. I'm right beside him by the locker.

 

He does it so to gets a rise out of you. Nothing to do with drugs.

 

 

That prayer, as I heard was about angry ranting as well. It had nothing to do with drugs.

I believe he was sent the link to the channel that day.

 

As what he said, as I overheard, "all those riches".

and I believe he said something along the lines of 'to keep himself from attacking' (or something like this, if I didn't mishear)

(be honest Douglas)

 

 

The Uganda guy Kelushi and rest of the people there. We just froze. For hours.

We didn't say anything, we didn't want to fight.

 

He gets out with the call of a friend from the door. He has a toothbrush in his mouth (?) for some reason,

and the look on his face, it's as if to state, he did what he wanted. The job is complete.

 

*It was a passive aggression, pre-planned to trigger a suppressive response from his peers (us) in the room.

By intimidation.

 

 

I believe what he was doing with Joshua, he was drunk at the time.

 

But above two was not influenced by any drugs, but his conscious choice.

 

And so was the time he was going crazy ranting about John sleeping naked.

 

That he was abused as a child. That is between him and John, so I have no idea,

 

but he was agitated, making a scene.

 

Joshua, John. These incidents were not particularly about malice.

 

 

However, the other times were directed at me, and it was indeed about malice, harm.

 

 

 

And the way he spoke about this to his peers. It was designed to antagonize me in the worst of light.

 

People wanted to beat ME up, and I could sense their hostility. I was alarmed.

 

 

If Bob, was defending Douglas. Was he there in the room when Douglas was doing these things?

 

No. He speaks out, as are everyone else, by their assumption.

 

 

I believe Douglas has already admitted to his wrong to an extent. From before.

 

 

I cannot say anything about the fight. As I accepted it. I should not have, I wasn't even angry.

 

Just agitated and alarmed that it was progressing. So I had to make it clear to everyone that i'm not a threat.

 

 

Douglas has been in the channel since long before the fight.

 

So I would say he also knew the outcome of trigger as well.

 

And if it was entirely out of anger then, that is even more questionable motive.

 

For someone who was trying to convince the people there in the lobby area I am not a threat.

 

 

 

And no. While he is a drug addict, and a alcoholic.

 

These things don't have anything to do with his values,

 

and his behavior to antagonize me specifically, out of all the people.

 

 

But especially I was trying to help him over and over again.

 

Whenever chance I got. Douglas needs to admit to this.

 

 

 

I didn't deserve that attack.

 

Nor did I deserve that backstabbing in the shelter.

 

Nor did I deserve his trying to disrupt my path, having been in the channel.

 

Nor do I deserve him up to this point, taunting, in the channel as well.

 

I am only reacting.

 

 

 

 

So the series of things he did, it stems from his values to be hostile towards someone he compares himself to.

 

It doesn't essentially have much to do with me, but more about himself.

 

There really was no reason to, if he decided we be civilized people and simply talk things over.

 

I was always willing to, initiate a conversation, but he was blunt, he got out of the room in agitation every single time.

 

 

I think he recognize this at this point. That this is about him. Not about me.

 

 

 

I believe that he should be punished for his behavior according to the Ontario code/bill of rights/conduct 168.

 

And that is about it.

 

I don't see this as a significant deal, despite the harm. Or maybe I must.  

 

 

Because he is however, quite a dangerous idiot.

 

In multiple levels. (Despite the 'friendliness' he shows there, I know.)

 

 

What you see, if I am correct, is in text. So the real-time issues he has offline isn't shown.

He is impulsive, emotionally uncontrollable, unreasonable (as in avoids communication entirely, often),

with hostile behavior.