Without emotions aside.

 

Let me summarize.

 

1. It is wrong for a group of doctors to try and even push a "intellectual discussion"

that determines the outcome of my mother's prospects by initiating a contest of

who is correct in determining the future.

 

But especially the son hasn't even slept for days and is unable to think,

or even listen to what they're saying properly. My only focus was to SAVE

MY MOTHER. And that is the only thing they should have listened to,

 

instead pushing their theories, for extended periods of time.

 

My initial "no" should have been enough. My intentions were clear.

 

 

 

2. That head nurse, certainly should NOT HAVE said,

as I pleaded her, them, with help in vitrification of my mother,

even as vitrification is unrelated to organ donation,

she said, "no, not unless you're donating her organs."

 

Who has the right to say this? Not to help someone not because

some legal issues at hand, of which they didn't discuss at all,

and simply forced their opinions on the future of cryonics and their

beliefs, and made it so that they won't help me because of conflict in

BELIEF? Because they thought that was the greater good, they refused to help me.

 

Do you not see the wrong in this? Despite my beliefs over MY MOTHER.

To help SAVE HER. Because they didn't believe in it, they refused to help.

Not because of legal issues, not because they lacked the skills.

 

BECAUSE OF THEIR BELIEFS.

 

Then they can do whatever they want with ANY patients, after their deaths,

according to the beliefs they hold. In religion, or otherwise. This is what

they've done. Do you understand where I am getting at?

 

 

3. "WELL.

 

WE.

 

WON'T.

 

HELP.

 

YOU."

 

Each word, broken down with a small pause in-between.

 

You can guess the hostility, and no remorse for their actions.

 

No sympathy over my situation. It was simply subjugation they aimed for,

 

over the belief they had.

 

 

NOT A SINGLE WORD ABOUT LEGAL ISSUES. NOT A SINGLE WORD ABOUT LACK OF SKILL.

 

IT WAS ABOUT THEIR BELIEF,

 

AND THIS WAS PUSHED ON TO ME.

 

 

 

Because they held on to their belief,

 

my mother was sacrificed,

 

my intent to save my mother ignored.

 

 

Because they believed cryonics won't work.

 

Because they believed organ donation is the only right thing.

 

 

 

This is pushing their own religion against mine,

 

and making it into a CONFLICT which should not have been at all.

 

It was simply son of the patient's plea to SAVE HIS OWN MOTHER.

 

 

 

Do you understand what I mean?

 

 

 

 

There is a law against affecting someone's else's religion with their own.

 

Yes, this pertains to matter of religion, as it is essentially a conflict

of moral BELIEFS.

 

No one side is wrong to believe whatever they want.

 

 

But to NOT HELP THE PERSON IN THE MOST HOSTILE MANNER,

 

WITHOUT stating the legal implications or skill/equipment issues,

 

and ONLY making it the conflict of belief,

 

 

THAT IS AT LEAST, PSYCHOLOGICAL ABUSE.

 

IN THE MOST DIRE TIMES.