I don't undertand some of these people, in Canada,

who continues harm. Who had admitted of their crimes,

they are not apprehended. They have done wrong plenty

yet they are still allowed to roam free.

 

I ask full charges to be effective immediately on this person, Steve.

 

I have warned countless times that this person be apprehended.

This excludes any assumptions that he makes a valid criticism,

a constructive argument to my ideas.

 

Nothing. His past attacks should have been halted by law

from him to further associate with me, period.

 

I have mentioned this numerous times.

 

If he pulled out the 'witness' card as an argument as he's done previous,

first, none of what he says should be believable, not after his

previous convictions and admission to lying. That is logical by law.

 

It means to delay, to create doubt, to create his 'soverignity' in order to further

have a shot at harm.  

 

Second, this does not dismiss him of his crimes held previously.

 

Let me tell you, to you, the authorities. He is entertaining.

He is seemingly no harm.

 

But you are making this decision at my expense.

You have no idea who this parasite is.

It will drain my blood at every chance it gets until you do something about it.

 

And incrementally, has he distorted my image or not?

Over the amount of time and number of times, he has created immense harm.

 

The attempted theft, slander, defamation. These are serious crimes.

Take out your own doubts, misunderstandings, what is left is his previous confession, conviction that should have followed.

 

Who dismissed this person of his crimes?

At whose expense? You pose a threat to my sanity, and emotional well-being, when you do nothing.

When you continue to let this person roam free.

 

You risk an inevitable conflict to arise towards this person from me, by letting him go.

What do you do when you are wronged to the core, and the effect of harm lasts socially?

 

I am very sorry to have to result in help from the Royal family.

And I absolutely understand your cautious approach.

 

This is why I am making an logical argument to his arrest.

 

There are people who has absolutely no limiter or decency.

 

 

 

If there is a opening, he will proliferate it, he will cause doubt. He will affect the mass.

There is evil in this.

 

 

He must be charged for his crimes, immediately.

 

 

Note that very nature of the victim being in the blind,

and allowing this harm to persist, that in it itself is very wrong.

 

This environment of harm, insult, it was allowed as an entertainment,

and even after the person has admitted of his crimes,

nothing was done about it, as he continued harm in various ways.

 

If everyone has forgotten what he's done, as I mention this countless times,

refer back to my writings. I hope they were not deliberately deleted to keep every one of my attackers from repeating themselves.