If i'm getting the relays correctly,

they are making an excuse - as if they neglected/stalled this

on purpose in order to protect me?

 

that doesn't make sense.

 

first, Biden's attacks began just after I announced

that I will be based in U.K.

 

second, i am not entirely sure of the timeline,

but i believe it is just after this they (the attackers,

the origins, Sean and the others) were dismissed of charges.

(If I am correct)

 

what followed was his personal attacks attempting to

insurrect, while recognizing that i am in the blind.

 

And I believe after quite a while,

he attempted attacking me again.

I have seen through the relays that

someone doesn't 'learn' and is repeating themselves.

I believe these are the times I attempted help from

the international criminal court.

 

protection? i don't think so.

violation of my rights? the public display? absolutely.

attacks? there is your evidence.

if i am protected, why am i attacked while i'm in this situation?

protection was toward the people who attacked me in the first place.

i am not clear on this, but please see how many times they got

away with it, and how i defended myself over and over again

as they were not being convicted.

 

this dragged on, in order to buy THEM the time.

while keeping me in the blind, disadvantaged at all times.

monitoring, breach in privacy, it continued despite my complaints.

 

so, please DO NOT buy into what they're saying.

it was an end-game/zero-sum game.

they tried to turn the table around constantly.

and now giving out unreasonable excuses.