He started from a wrong place,

just to save a few dollars

(as compared to what USA holds)

 

then he incrementally made it worse

by antagonizing me in the worst of ways.

 

It does not make sense, to focus on a single

individual. When there are many competitors

in this world.

 

And in what ways is the question.

What ways. How.

 

This is harassment, it is cyber-bullying.

 

Again, up until now, it was the Sea Platform.

 

Even if I started with

the idea to help U.K from the very beginning.

 

Even then, did he have the right to attack

politically? A person essentially working

with a citizen of the USA (Mr Musk)?

 

That is against the international treaty.

That is against the interest of the nation.

 

Progress can work to benefit USA in many ways.

He only stepped in and antagonized me,

he made my relations with USA worse.

 

And this is the result. Whether my works or not

is irrelevant. I feel against USA when I did not before.

I merely stated I would move to U.K. That was all.

 

Don't confuse the order. Effect of harm on economy,

if there is, only comes after you attack the creator.

 

And that is because of the reaction to,

he left me no choice but to antagonize U.S.A,

whereas I had nothing but admiration for the great nation.

 

My tone was respectful in the beginning as well,

calling him "Sir".

 

And no, even if you force your political reasons,

you cannot get away with harassment,

cyber-bullying, the targeting.

 

What was the point of all this?

 

If anything, he should have encouraged partnership and attempt to work out a deal

to benefit USA in some way. I'm sure that was probable.

 

What was the point in personally attacking me?

When I am working Mr Musk?