I see the clip from youtube stating:

"I don't even see the code"

with a character from Matrix movie staring into a screen.

 

If this is what the current authorities addressing

Becky, Robert and Sean are stating,

 

this trial must be held with me present,

to interpret their relays.

 

Further,

 

 

my suspicions of corruption are as follows.

 

Fact:

 

1. Becky has already asserted that because I was trying to make her "eat her parents"

(which was in one of her relays as well) that I was requesting money from them as

settlement for the abuse that was happening, that she pushed this harm. In her mind

that was justified. Despite the fact that I was being reasonable.

 

She ADMITTED to her crime.

 

2. Sean Kernan claimed he did these things due to abuse from his father.

A traumatic past that broke his arm(?) and that abuse, stayed with him

and he treated me with a different form of abuse.

 

He ADMITTED to his crime as well.

 

3. Was my requests of their relays, my messages to Becky, the writing and upvotes

to be shown on public. (So they can pinpoint according to events that's occured,

following the metaphors correctly). Was this denied? Even a few interpretation will

trigger the rest to be understood with the keywords. If so, then this assessment is

happening internally. Of which, the authorities cannot be trusted.

 

4. If the previous authorities who initially convicted these people, they are not

coming forth with the data and what they observed, interacted during those times.

Then they are silenced. They should be working with the current authorities.

 

5. The fact that Sean Kernan went to the facility, physically. And sent those

threatening message PRIOR to this. And AFTER I stated my fears, this ALONE should

have charged him. But despite the HISTORY behind the abuse and their confessions,

ALL THIS IS BEING IGNORED.

 

 

I have no doubts that the authorities can't follow every relays.

But I have no doubt they understand there was interaction. And the relays are

about communication towards me. This is why I replied in real-time to Becky.

Otherwise she would not be sending another relay following my messages.

 

Hence if they truly cannot follow the relays, and somehow came to that

they are free. This is unreasonable way to favor, dismiss their attacks

on an 'ambiguous ground' DESPITE the fact that they know the evidence is

present AFTER knowing that it is a communication towards me.

 

Meaning. INCOMPLETION of interpretation of the relays is WILLFUL NEGLECTION

of the overall investigation!

 

This trial is flawed if they are not charged.

 

And I must be there to create a report, observing their relays.

 

Is my statement clear?

 

 

 

 

There is something going on here as well.

 

 

New authorities, who at least ADMITS there was communication between me and them,

and is willing to investigate FULLY into each relays as much as possible,

WORKING with the previous people who convicted them ----

 

MUST COME FORTH.

 

The current, if they are not convicted as the relays suggest,

then that is WILLFUL NEGLECTION. They are putting a blind-eye deliberately, to favor my attackers.