Bottom line is this:

 

There is clearly, communication present.

 

So why are they coming to a conclusion without trying to interpret the upvotes?

 

That is deliberately to let them go.

 

They are dismissing evidence as if it's not there.

 

 

If the communication was present, and that is the dialogue,

I am saying there was abuse present, and there was,

 

how can the interpretations be simply ignored?

 

 

If they were let go, they were let go for wrong reasons,

and there is NO ONE there to properly assess the upvotes,

 

and they will continue to mislead.