On Douglas, please do understand there was bullying.

There was passive aggression (in repeat), and to 'subjugate' the person

by trying to intimidate them (the prayer in the room).

*(along with the phone calls, or talking behind the person for passive subjugation initiated

by others, getting others to initiate this)

 

Understand that he is the one who asked me to fight him. Not I.

I merely went there to explain who I am.

 

My reaction was that of reaction, from being abused.

Reaction of frustration, and slight anger. But of which

I quickly apologized for when I saw him startled.

 

Point again, is that information on reconciliation was

dismissed in his mind, and he backstabbed me, making

me a target to his peers, and while having being in that

channel.

 

So his motivations were stemming from different place

than my reaction alone.

 

I see relays on how this is being overturned,

it is as if people forget what I wrote about and cannot

summarize the points.

 

So I am writing again. BE LOGICAL.

 

Do not deviate away from this.

 

There was a undertone of threat, there was undertone of

manipulation of the environment, and this includes

my being in the channel. He included himself into it,

timing wise, he knows better to when to disrupt and

when not to.

 

 

These are violations. Ontario Code 168,

absolutely applies for slander, and intented harm

with passive aggression through others.

 

I will dismiss the actual violence that followed as I accepted.

But other factors were by his own accord.

He knew well not to manipulate the environment,

I can easily become a target in my situation.