In all instances, I have made it clear to Douglas

that I am not trying to fight him when I was

questioning if he's talking to people people

behind my back. I was agitated at that the

fact that I was being harassed. Douglas was

avoiding my question beside Bob, outside.

Seemingly alarmed. I was making clear that

i'm not trying to fight him. But I had to

know and put a stop to it.

 

If any story is becoming twisted to work on his favor,

 

please understand that Douglas himself has shook my hand

and said: "Sorry for talking shit about you Johnny."

 

After we've reconciled.

 

And yet, he didn't clean up with his friends, deliberately.

(To save his own image)

 

and harassment continued.

 

And that is where my investigation was.

 

Once he tested my friendliness, (that I did not have hostility)

 

he became aggressive, knowing the fact that I am not.

 

I had the right to speak to those people at the TV room,

and I was polite at that. (To speak clearly I am no danger, and

speaking of my reasons of my conflict with Douglas, that I was being bullied)

 

So it sounds like he is repeatedly getting away from

his 'deceptive manipulation of the environment - ultimately resulting

to violence in his favor.' And bullying, terrifying the room, building

up to fight me ultimately. He built up hostility, and became agitated,

violent.

 

So Bill 168 applies in this case. In all instances, I have made it

clear I wasn't trying to fight him. Yet he insisted in the end.

 

My mistake for thinking I can dismantle everything by accepting it.

 

But what led to that point, was Douglas' hostility.

 

Not mine.

 

 

I was friendly to him once after reconciliation.

 

He used this against me.