Don't give me all that greater good bull.

 

There was unnecessary abuse.

 

It was each time after I released an idea.

 

It was each time I 'won' over people who were attacking.

 

Even disguising them, as they've died.

 

Count all the instances.

 

What was said, what was commanded.

 

 

 

Do not repeat this abuse again.

 

 

You could have always been straight-forward.

 

 

Instead you chose to affect my mood.

 

 

 

 

You could have been straight-forward with the agreement,

 

you deviated away from this however ways possible.

 

However way to keep me unattended, unsupported.

 

 

That time you should have helped me was long, long ago.

 

I did not need any of your harassment.

 

He is probably stating 'greater good' to get out of trouble.

 

 

No it wasn't.

 

There was a abuse and torture component, there was 'domestication'.

To keep me at 'bay'. To affect my productivity.

 

How do you get out of, after all this,

 

breaching the agreement and giving me yet another task,

 

"Only way to get out of the Matrix, you must do this and that."

 

That isn't abuse? That isn't manipulation?

 

After agreement? Studio apartment, he breaches.

Goes into cash. He breaches again.

 

 

How many times has he done this? 50? 100?

 

Count all the instances, how it was.

 

What triggered his actions.

 

Often the trigger is AFTER I RELEASE an IDEA.

 

What excuse does he have for that?

 

 

Everything else as well.

 

 

NO, he cannot state any 'greater good' in this.

 

He meant to satisfy himself.

 

This is not an isolated incident, it happend so many times.

 

And the key is this. I requested he stop. I mentioned this is abuse.

How I am being affected. Many times. He continued.

 

You don't think he does this to his peers?

 

There is an abusive component here.

 

Don't buy into it. There is truth in what he says, and there is truth in what I say as well.

He means to convolute that intent.

 

But when it's both.

 

Should you be looking at the 'greater good'?

Can you dismiss the bad?

Or should you dismiss the good?

 

Do you help a person by trying to affect them in a bad way?

 

I mentioned earlier, "you are providing the illness, then you give me the medicine."

 

Is there any wrong in this?

 

Am I the one who is morally unjust?

 

Or are you people WILLING to just buy into his words?

 

Looking for leniency?

 

 

 

As I mentioned before. Mr Musk plays this game from the top. It is highly diluted, his intent

from there. He can shift either way, good or the bad, and you don't know what he's doing ultimately.

It would seem like he was doing this for greater good, and sure, maybe.

But 90% of the time, it wasn't necessary at all. He just enjoyed the process,

and so was the trigger of that, it was after I released an idea.

 

Further, most importantly. I said it was abuse. I said I do not wish to be affected.

I expressed this many times clearly.

 

To ignore someone's request. To be manipulative. To INSIST on it, despite the harm.

And through misleads, gaslights.

 

Further, these breach in agreements. I mentioned before, it's like being in that

movie "Bedazzled" where the devil grants you wishes only there is always a catch,

and ultimately the wish is dismantled, so he must use up another.

 

I worked over a year, coming up with ideas, over and over. And I believe I have over-delivered as

far as my initial expectations as a homeless person goes.

 

None of that matters. He INSISTS on continued manipulation, despite previous agreements.

He INSISTS on breaching it. He finds this entertaining. My situation, my suffering.

 

He creates, he invites people to gaslight me, he makes me a target. Others join in.

 

 

Just don't buy into what he says as-is.

 

 

Look into it closely, from beginning to end, how many times, and for what reasons, and what trigger.

 

See if all that was necessary at all.

 

 

 

I've had up to my neck with this guy. I can see why there are people who hate him.

 

THIS IS MISTREATMENT OF A PERSON.

 

BE CLEAR ABOUT THAT.