and Dan, if he was convicted,

please don't mislead on the relays.

 

 

it's a waste of time and energy

for me to write again and again.

 

 

authorities should be aware on what he's done.

 

since long ago.

 

 

 

those authorities who initially convicted Adam,

they should be contacted and their evidence and data

should be shared.

 

It looks as though many things were deliberately submerged,

and changed direction favoring Adam.

 

This should not have happened.

 

He meant harm, he used my situation under the disguise of investment,

and deviated away from moral obligations as CEO,

and further, more importantly, what followed long after,

his attempt to destroy my life, was shown over and over again.

and the motives were based on what he confessed.

jealousy, competition.

 

if you protect him under the authoritative order,

first, he should NOT have been the one to be on charge of monitoring me.

this was deliberate attempt to dismiss his charges, and dilute his actions.

 

and to this very day, it continues.

no, it has to be differentiated - clearly -

what was intended harm, what 'wasn't'.

 

technically all was a breach in human rights.

it was illegal in it itself.

 

however, if to strictly focus on his intent

and what does not relate to authorities then.

 

he is still guilty of serious harm/abuse.