The current troublemaker, (105C)

has defiance, and challenge, when trying spoken to about these issues.

 

Despite being his wrong.

 

But there is no insinuation of violence, or attempting to intimidate

a person by terror. Of which Douglas has done, spending many hours

by the window, when everyone was trying to sleep.

 

While the guy from Uganda - he and I may have differences,

but I don't think he would refute the idea that Douglas was

terrorizing the room.

 

What was disturbing was that end of the prayer, he immediately

switched off this acting, and went out the door normally with this friend.

As if to state 'mission accomplished' (in intimidating people in the room)

 

the talk behind me with other people was about violence as well i believe.

he must have said something about wanting to beat me up or something like that.

 

which ultimately led to violence.

 

my being getting mad at Douglas, by yell, "i'm gonna go crazy if you don't

stop!" (which followed an apology and a hug)

 

was because Douglas was continuing abuse, despite having said he would stop.

He was clearly, being defiant, stating his rights. As is the person now

from 105C.

 

I have written the letter about his behavior to Milena. Bring this back up again.

 

All that's happened clearly led to pre-meditated, willing violence.

 

 

I had no choice but to accept that challenge, if to dismantle whatever is going on

behind my back by rumors, creating further potential threats and harm.

Which has happened before, about "stabbing" a person.

 

 

So may I ask,

 

 

Why was he dismissed of his charges?

 

 

 

Who decided it was okay?

 

 

This was not a friendly thing. If there was friendliness between him and I, it was 'created' by my side to reduce the tension.

There was clear insinuation of using power to overpower the person, relentless asking for money, picking up food, etc,

AFTER his friend threatened with 'stabbing' part. Which put me at a state of submission.

 

What Douglas did, during those times and during the fight was aiming physical subjugation.

 

These were clearly born from pre-meditated violence, and the intent has been clear, progressive from the very beginning.

 

You will not fall for his 'friendly' talk on the channel.

 

He was, and clearly, violent.

 

 

Why wasn't he charged?