Authorities,

 

there are things he should be charged for, in all fairness.

 

Slander, endangering a person indirectly.

 

Psychological abuse, terrorizing the room/deviation in agreements.

 

intended to manipulate the environment (having being in that channel

prior to the fight)

 

Ultimately, the fight itself and how it was pushed to that direction.

And resulting to, violence.

 

 

hmm.... i think only 1 or 2 applies. maybe. not all.

i have no idea how the law assumes these actions.

is it somewhat domestic? within a building?

i have no idea.

 

 

 

but overall.....

 

 

To dismiss it all, despite witnesses, despite seen his intent.

 

Despite the harm.

 

 

You were then swayed by the opinions.

 

People who were not present there, their opinions remains opinions.

 

They cannot possibly know.

 

 

Judge by the facts. What has happened.