I'd like to know,

what of Adam's verdict?

 

After all that, and personal humiliation

he's made to the employees (video of me urinating) after

sending something about me committing suicide,

among all other things he's done.

 

was he let go because the authorities told

him to monitor me?

 

no. you would be convoluting these actions.

what he's done personally towards me,

and what he's done as what authorities told him to do,

 

these are different things.

 

there was intentional harm, and a strong one at that.

 

read all my writings on him from previous.

 

you people gave him power to control my life,

 

and he can switch back and forth on the good

and bad intent however he wishes,

 

whatever he says can be diluted. even the intent.

 

but if there was a serious action to destroy me,

nothing he says can be accepted. whether it seem

positive. for instance, relaying this channel to

everyone i meet, can work both ways. both ill or good.

 

it is gambling in it itself as well.

 

 

so i'm thinking, this person was let go

judging by way he was dealing on Twitter, if the

relays are true.

 

NO. understand this, there were many things

he's done to destroy my life.

 

this has been confessed as well.

 

if he was simply let go for that one reason -

authorities *allowing him to monitor,

 

then no, you are merely extending corruption.