As for Mr Musk, trying to intervene in all this

trying to change the outcome by misleading.

As he has attempted before.

That is a felony and yet -----

pranks are benign by nature.

What he does, he meddles with important

forces that has significant meaning,

things that are serious.

So why that is allowed.

I have no idea.

 

 

Mr Musk, it's not just about accepting the match.

The point is:

 

1. My peaceful suggestions were refused in anger.

 

2. My vulnerability because of my attire,

which was spoken prior, was ignored. He fully

used that to his advantage, to deliver violence.

 

3. Tackling someone when slippers, pajamas,

pummeling them on the nose when the body hit the ground.

Dangerous cheats.

 

Further, within the shelter:

 

1. He should have 'cleaned up' fully revealing all the details.

2. He should not have conspired with his friends, whatever it was.

3. He should not have went into the realm of violence.

 

So did that come to conclusion it doesn't matter?

 

That I was technically in 'agreement'?

Did I agree to be exploited of my vulnerabilities through my wear?

Was it a fair exchange of defense as I suggested?

 

 

 

Context counts people.....

 

 

 

 

 

I think the correct thing for shelter staff to do

was.... instead thinking about giving more privilege or no privilege,

once they recognized i am a target due to my situation in the channel,

it would have been safer to keep me in a place where there were

less people per room....

 

but i have no idea. i won't judge