Reading Mr. Weill's relays here.

 

Under no circumstance this monitoring, hacking,

should have been allowed.

 

As I stated, it was their *choice to keep me in the blind.

And I was always here.

 

Meaning, they could have communicated with me to deal.

With any conditions/situations that they felt

should be monitored.

 

I certainly would have agreed to an extent.

 

However, despite whatever excuses they're making to

save themselves, they breached someone's privacy

without a proper communication/warrant.

 

More importantly, Adam has used this situation in such

a way that was clearly harassment. Sending threats

of releasing humiliating videos, "leaking",

again releasing another video from the past.

I've clearly stated this many times. That he was

acting out of jealousy. And shown proof thereof.

 

The fact that the authorities chose to use *specifically

Adam. Who has an emotional tie towards me in an negative way.

The fact that they could have hired anyone else. Yet they didn't.

 

Along with Becky, Robert, Sean, Anna.

This was clearly an attempt to 'turn the table around'

trying to dismiss their charges.

 

These authorities had no right in the first place to breach

someone's privacy but especially when I was already present,

and willing to communicate. These were simply attacks.

 

They have already known that Adam was abusive and I have

made this very clear many times. Yet it was continued,

specifically with Adam. I repeat this.

 

Specifically with Adam.

 

Of all the people they could use, the talented programmers/hackers.

Who has done no wrong towards myself - they specifically used Adam.

In order to make an excuse that their actions were justified.

 

This same strategy was further supported by Mr. Biden.

Using my allegations against me and justifiying their actions.

 

Note that they (Becky, Robert, Sean, Anna) began this prior to any allegations

made towards me.

 

What Mr Biden did, was not done in a political/government level.

But it was personal. He intervened personally, commented personally.

He monitored the situation personally. Responded personally.

Along all these duration, and certainly was aware of this every step

of the way. He has seen my complaints, yet the attacks were allowed to go on.

 

Keeping me in the blind, while he could have easily spoken to the

authorities here in *Canada, if not the PM himself, and get me a

fair say, fair observation to their false defense (I believe they have tried

to mislead the public and the jury until I spoke out, Becky, Robert, Sean, Anna)

and yet it still goes on. My disadvantage was clear. And their advantages were

shown. Their harmful intent was clearly shown over and over again.

Yet this was personally dismissed by Mr Biden.

 

Under no circumstance, he cannot cover his actions under 'acting under the best

interest of the country' as the president. He was acting under the best

interest of helping his former colleague, Frank Kernan and his son,

and the people related. That was the first thing.

 

Second, for reasons of competing economics, you do not attack an INDIVIDUAL.

You may attack, dismiss, avoid, or counter offer a DEAL made from an nation.

But you do not attack an individual on his way to growth and development

PERSONALLY. And using other people as well. While stripping this person's

basic rights. That too, is a felony.

 

Not to mention attempted inflation for their gain. Of my allegations.

What these people did, it was an attack toward an individual to save

people in an indivudal level. In exchange, it was personal.

 

The rest, they are making excuses.

ICC must intervene into this corruption.

 

They will cherry-pick the law into their favor and dismiss their obvious wrong.