I've mentioned to him several times in the beginning

as well. Gently saying, that I think he and I

should keep some distance. *not *some distance,

but i believe i said i think we should just not talk

to each other -distance.

 

But he just goes on talking, asking favors,

initiating conversation.... sigh.....

 

we slightly fought, as he yelled and defended

himself after agreement he wouldn't do so,

contradicting himself, and keeps going on.

i yelled as well. he wouldn't be clear,

convoluting things, deviating away from the answer.

 

from way he acted since the beginning,

(and i look back, my assumptions were correct)

in that, he was 'sizing someone up'

as Joshua briefly experienced,

with a very wild character,

who replies again and again with same remarks.

whether he was on something i don't know.

he didn't seem stable (he wasn't)

combined with different attributes,

speaking about his current mental condition,

and repeating offending behavior

i was under the belief that i am being

passively subjugated/ being harrassed.

 

we lightly hugged and tapped our backs,

to understand that there are no hostilities.

 

and the next day i believe he shook his hands

saying "sorry for saying shit about you johnny".

 

i accepted that with a smile.

 

the trouble is that, he didn't 'clean up'.

and everywhere i go, people were

shouting out about it.

 

not telling people in detail

= trying to keep his image.

 

it's only very recently (2 weeks or so ago)

that he told people not to bother me.

 

but it kept on happening again anyway.

so i told him to tell them in detail more.

our discussion.

 

and he refused, again agitated yelling

and storming out of the room.

 

it should have been in the realm of this discussion.

 

but physical match is what he suggested.

 

up to this point is what the shelter may decide,

 

 

------

 

 

and the rest, what happened in the park,

 

that is what the authorities should decide.

 

whether to charge him or not.

 

despite my stating controlled match.

 

instead a violent one.

 

 

 

-----

 

 

 

in both these cases,

 

within the shelter = violence was insinuated even after reconciliation. (i had the right to state myself and my experiences, and these were words)

 

out the shelter = violence was applied even after suggesting a fair, gentle option.

 

 

 

 

 

 

he would deny it of course,

but way he backstabs, and gaslights.

these processes were being monitored

so i think people there already know

my assumptions were true.

he has this 'hood' mentality going on.

underlined with violence, whether

in his mind alone or otherwise.

whichever way, ultimately,

he proved himself of his harmful intent.

and yes, i was a victim throughout.

 

 

please understand that these backstabbing

should not have followed.

and the violence to the effect he did.

 

unstable, dangerous.

 

 

 

if i've the right,

and i must. for all that's happened.

i press full charges on this person.