Their involvement must be fully analyzed

before coming to a decision,

and that has everything to do with

their relays towards me.

 

How they were informing me every step of the way,

and what relays show their intent, their hostilities.

 

And what actions they've taken prior, during,

these events, and the after.

 

All those in comparison, with my analysis

can determine the outcome.

 

Right now, they can say whatever they want

and get away with it.

 

But obviously, my observation, my say

is required on the relays in order to

properly see what transpired doesn't it?

 

And here is the problem.

 

They are not allowing this.

Stalling this in purpose so

that the authorities can make a decision favoring them.

 

And by the time i'm in there,

the judgement has been made.

 

 

However, it must only be revoked if I cannot agree with it.

Because that outcome is based on incomplete data.

And what I say is based on logic, is it not?

 

The observation, the relays. They will obviously hide its meaning.

It would be difficult for the authorities to interpret it,

and may also hide the meaning to their favor depending on

who the authorities are hired by whom, even if they understand it.

 

My observation and say is required for proper assessment of their

involvement and thereby proving their intent.