Revised:

 

While the matter may be too small to be recognized by the ICC or foreign authorities,

people who are unrelated to the States or Canada must look into this.

 

From my perspective, and should be from many others, it would be clear.

That despite Mr Biden, if he has made excuses such as "dementia", or

"if you are unable to read even the teleprompter" (if such excuses were made)

it would be irrelevant.

 

1. Their actions of crime, the harassment and attempt to destroy my life

has nothing to do with my allegations. They can't bring this up as an excuse.

Under any circumstance.  

 

2. And at the request of former colleague, I presume. Frank Kernan.

Mr Biden intervened personally. Dismissed their actions.

While it should be counted as harassment/attempted destruction. He knew both these facts.

 

3. I am in the blind. He knew this as well. All these reasons are against the constitution.

 

4. The fact that the harassment is on-going, through Adam. And even the fact my mother

was in question is their desperate attempt to 'turn the table' around.

 

It just keeps going. No i'm not creating a conspiracy theory.

And when I say my rights as an individual, i'm not just talking about

something like the "Miranda rights". Where I should be seeing things in person, in the open,

along with proper defense. I am saying, they continue this harassment EVEN WHILE KNOWING

that I am severely disadvantaged, while dismissing their own wrong, their previous actions of harm.

 

They were aware it was wrong. But they attempted bullying their way through.

These were not the actions of a public servant but a tyrant using his power.

 

Since the president of the USA himself was involved in this,

International criminal court may need to look into the unreasonable excuses they're making.

It is an act of aggression. Against a singular individual.

Who was clearly attacked in many ways by their citizens, by their leader (personally) and it is on-going.

 

Nature of my work and its prospects is about saving people from poverty, hunger, war.

While the rewards and investment scale may be small/next to nothing to what is being

spent/earned in USA. That is not the point. It is the nature of the work they went against

and the potential of it. It can be counted as an act of aggression for reasons pertaining

to competing economics, or personal subjugation before I acquire help/aid as well.

 

Why am I not being allowed contact?

 

Can another authority unaffected and unreleated to the jurisdiction of government of USA

(of any form) please look into this? I am under the belief that they are heavily favoring

these excuses that they've made, and dismissing the current on-going abuse as well.

While all attacks persist at every chance they can get.