If in the beginning,

I asked for Adam for help,

and there was no response on it.

 

I was going to the police station myself

and reporting the progress back to Adam.

 

I probably didn't want to bother him further.

 

However. Adam, being one of the key observers of this abuse,

should have stepped in himself back then.

 

He was the missing link. Observing Anna's spamming to his channel.

They well knew that I was being targeted, and they well had the power

to stop this had they reported it then, but they did not.

 

To take advantage of my words. That I did not want to be bother.

 

No, morally not right. When it is HIS channel that is involved.

That HE holds the key to all the evidence of what is going on.

The spamming.

 

He obviously just neglected and observed for the benefit/amusement.

Later gave me opportunity on the investment.

To give himself another role than just being merely an observer.

 

If to be assigned as a role as investor, perhaps then,

he wouldn't be questioned of his motives.

 

But no. It doesn't matter whether I gave Adam a choice to contact the police or not.

To help or not. If he was the missing link, the observer in detail, the traffic,

the spamming, the data of the abuse, then he was the one who should have came forth.

 

Not just stand-aside and observe, (which later he PARTCIPATED in hacking,

and it became worse)

 

However, this turned into abuse not only with the permission from the authorities to hack,

but through his own emotions of competitiveness and jealousy.

 

So Adam, BECAME Anna, as Anna stepped down somewhat in the process.

 

Please look into series of actions he did.

 

No, I don't believe that his actions can be covered by the technicality of my statements offering freedom of 'choice'.

I was obviously in the blind and I needed help. He was the missing link, who first observed the abuse, and later became an abuser himself.

 

So please do not confuse this.