And no, this isn't because i'm trying to save money on

15M I promised. These are valid questions.

Questions coming from the fact that I was complaining

about this over and over again. Pleading.

Yet it went on.

 

Furthermore, on the on-going hacking.

Yes it is primarily the responsibility of the

authorities in the States. However,

what dialogue was exchanged to protect my rights

as a Canadian citizen by the authorities here?

 

It is as if, from my observation, and possibly

obvious to the people there as well,

 

that the authorities here were simply *watching.

Passively encouraging every one of these attackers.

 

See how it plays out.

 

Those are my questions.

 

If someone is being accused of something,

are the defendants allowed to be stoned in the process,

stripped of their individual rights?

 

 

If this is the excuse they are making.

 

 

There seems to be deterministic evidence

to their willful criminal negligence.

 

Instead protecting my rights,

they were passively encouraging

every possible attacks there could be.

 

Despite knowing what they should have done.

 

Again, this is not accusation, but speculation based on

observation and experience of what was going on.

 

The evidence becomes deterministic, when seeing prior (motive)

and what was done following.

 

(neglect, allowing on-going abuse even after they admitted to crime,

and most likely, no charges made to them according to their rules,

while my lasting damage remains)

 

 

In all cases, I should have been protected.

 

I had to stand my ground and fight back on my own.

 

Over and over again. Despite my pleas to help.

 

 

I think it is correct that this must be addressed,

and those people who attacked, they should be charged

for their actions.

 

 

It is as if, everything is dismissed as public 'opinion'

completely ignoring or recognizing the fact that

I am an individual, a Canadian citizen, being attacked.