jso when i say, 'no charges made to them according to their rules'

or diminished or dismissed, they continued harassment.

 

and this was allowed.

 

what warnings were given, what penalty for their actions,

and why was it dismissed?

 

the damage that is made on me, it's nothing?

 

when this isn't local level, but international, seen by millions,

and their obvious attempt was destruction toward my life?

 

 

where I am confused is,

 

I believe it's the court's decision to provide adequate penalty,

whereas, the police should have stopped continued harassment.

 

both of which seem to have neglected my rights.

the damages made on myself, and repeating offense made by the

attackers.

 

 

so because it repeated over and over again. Over many months,

 

I am saying there was certainly willful criminal negligence

and if not passive encouragement to the attacker's offense.

 

I was treated like I was nothing. I had no say in it.

 

*As if parents silencing a petulant child despite the bullies

continue to harass this child.

 

I don't know what is going on. I have no idea ultimately

what penalty was given to them. If too little or if there was nothing,

that certainly is an insult to my individuality and my rights.

 

And that is how I feel. To be treated like a punching bag.

 

WHY was the harassment allowed to this duration,

when I pleaded for help,

 

Why did it continue?

 

And you were all fully observing the situation?

 

 

What was the court doing?

What was the police doing?

 

 

I won't jump to conclusions. I was, and I am still blind.

 

However, it is seemingly evident that these harassment,

was *allowed. Neglect was clearly present.

 

 

And please don't give me that freedom of speech insanity.

There is a clear difference between opinion and harassment.