This Robert keeps coming up on Youtube feeds.

 

He should not be talking about me at all.

 

 

Where he started came from a place of hostility,

 

which includes attempted theft and humiliation

by photo (evidence of abuse which

he aimed to spread, being digital, fully aware

that millions are watching)

 

and hence, anything he says, is an extension

of these acts. It is to cause harm.

It should be counted as added charge.

 

 

But he is allowed to speak freely,

just like Steve. In all that duration.

 

 

If he didn't start that way, then as with others,

criticism would be allowed. (It appears that is what he

may be doing now, still hoping for harm)

 

But he clearly is extending himself from the previous actions.

Then, because there was criminal negligence involved prior,

and because his harassment, be it currently lesser than Steve,

continues, IF he wasn't charged for the crimes he did earlier

(which is equivalent to Steve, if not more so, as photographs were involved),

that should be counted,

 

and further, his current actions should be counted as

continued harassment as well.