If the court did not give adequate punishment to these

attackers, dismissed them, or given too little punishment,

 

AND allowed further harassment to continue,

 

 

I believe I have to right to restructure the court

and its appointed team, (judges and juries)

 

as there was corruption present.

 

 

And see not only the fair punishment for these

individuals of willful criminal negligence,

and violation of my rights,

 

 

but to address these attackers again.

 

Proper charges should have been made to them.

 

 

 

And I have the right to ask this,

 

 

BECAUSE,

 

 

the harassment was allowed to continue for many months

after their admission to crime was already recognized.

 

 

This means there was corruption, in favor of the attackers.

 

This means there was passive encouragement to attack my path,

my well-being, my career.

 

 

A child complains because he is getting bullied in school.

Teacher does nothing. Bullies continue bullying.

 

Then what should the parent be doing?

Get the child out of the school, punish both the teachers

and the bullies.

 

 

And yes, it is precisely because I am behind the screen,

it is because I am moving up, there was willful neglection

of criminal activity according to their values.

 

A passive encouragement for the attackers.

 

How else to explain this continued abuse when they were fully observing?