Please understand that whatever he released,

it's tangible evidence as abuse,

and it is lasting. He aimed to humiliate,

and attempted theft as well.

 

He aimed to destroy the life of a complete stranger.

I have hardly ever spoke to this person.

 

I am certain there are laws against what he did.

 

I am not letting it go, unless he is charged.

 

If he was forgiven, I don't understand.

It was uncalled for, and he's actually

waited there in front of the room for hours,

just to take my photos.

 

He aimed at destroying my image, my life.

 

I have done nothing to him to deserve this.

 

When someone was asking for his help to move,

that they'd be paying cash for his help,

I ran upstairs to answer this person,

and to relay to him.

 

I was being helpful.

 

No, he can't make up reasons for these attacks.

 

The level of attacks were impossibly strong.

It was done in the public.

It was aimed to destroy a person's image,

it was aimed to destroy a person's career.

 

He has to be charged for this.

 

Along with Steve.

 

There is no difference between the two,

in case with Robert, he is showing tangible evidence

to his abuse.

 

To the authorities watching, it may seem like not a

big deal. If it was something that was attempted,

within this house, within this circle of people,

as roommates, then that is not a big deal.

 

But this was public, when billions of dollars

were in progress, where image means a great deal.

 

This person fully intended harm.

Fully observing what is going on.

 

If you've simply forgiven him,

that would be negligence, he would still pose

danger in many ways, not only to myself.

 

As what he did, the origins were sociopathic.

It is as if, stabbing a stranger.

 

That is unreasonable harm.