And I would like to stress,

 

because everything is done virtually,

 

things seem to overlap and connect to each other.

 

 

But they do not.

 

 

Business is business.

 

 

 

However, these people will be addressed

by proper people later on.

 

 

And I am sorry to say this, but

if there was negligence,

 

ultimately an decisive action

that favors permission of abuse,

where no consequences were mentioned,

or carried out, despite the fact

that they were repeating this abuse,

 

then those responsibilities must be asked for as well.

 

 

I believe this is fair.

 

 

What people may be confusing, is that this is

happening in a local level. It is not.

 

It is international, seen by millions.

If treated like nothing,

 

the damage toward me is lasting, digitized, spread,

while they walk away free. This will not be.

 

 

So I will see what was fair, and what was not.

And my lawyers will make sense of this

with proper statements from the law.

 

But people, can't you see?

 

It's fairly simple. They already gave themselves

to loss. They provided evidence all by themselves.

Repeated abuse, in public.

 

And their excuses cannot be heard.

Too many contradictions. Evidence will be clear.