For those who are fluent in law,

can you please back me up on this.

 

These people caused lasting defamation on my character and my career.

They attempted destruction.

 

 

 

 

 

I'm sorry to keep going back to this.

 

All of this.

 

 

I just do not want to be affected/driven,

because people like Robert or Steve,

 

completely disrespected/treated me as a

pushover -

 

to be attempting all this and has gotten away with it.

 

 

It was serious harassment, it was indirect violence,

intended harm by its nature.

 

 

 

My intent, I was trying to be helpful to both.

With Steve, due to his passive aggressive abuse,

I stated my retraction - of my offers.

 

With Robert, there was no passive abuse while

he was here until I realized what he was doing

with the phone camera in front of the room.

Until he released an image to humiliate.

 

With Robert, there was no conversation, no dialogue

that could have predicted/given hints to his behavior.

I was being helpful.

 

With Steve, I expected some amount of 'spiteful words' perhaps.

As no person, they want to admit to their wrong.

 

But theft, defamation to this severity, attempted destruction. I did not.

 

Both these individuals, harassed a person in public.

 

Fully knowing the severity of their actions,

as they know, even better than myself,

the offers and rewards that is coming toward me.

 

And if what they did, is simply dismissed...

 

Will I not be driven? That these people

harming someone completely unassuming,

out of whatever they brought up in themselves.

 

It would indicate it is OKAY to harass/abuse

someone. That it is in their 'right' to

abuse someone like this in the public.

 

It would be negligence.

 

Quoting Ontario defamation law,

 

"The law focuses on the protection of an individual's

reputation from harm. Two competing interests are

weighed against each other:

 

the protection of an individual's reputation,

and the right to freedom of speech."

 

Let me ask, is it in their right of freedom of speech,

to attempt humiliating a person with a photo in public,

attempting theft of ideas, of which the reward is

an astronomical amount.

 

Releasing that photo was to create a

perception to belittle someone of their worth.

It was a way of TREATMENT.

 

As has Steve.

 

Both these individuals had common perception,

to TREAT me in this way. This was not a matter of

freedom of speech, but about harassment.

 

To both these individuals, in the beginning,

I have shown leniency, until I recognized what they

were doing. I did not even know how far they were

going, how far the hostilities were.

 

If such a TREATMENT of abuse is allowed,

carried on to the public,

severity of harm, fully recognized.

 

They need to be charged of this.

 

If you, yourselves were in my situation.

Roommates doing all they can to DESTROY you.

Harassment, defamation, theft, humiliation.

 

And you did nothing. Would you simply forgive?

 

Their rights:

 

A passing disappointment of my personality perhaps.

Then they may have the right of disliking me, yes.

But to attempt destroying me, through all sorts of ways?

Attempting lasting defamation?

 

No.

 

That is TREATMENT. Intentional derogation.

Something so disrespectful, that they felt they could

grab this opportunity for their benefit, whereas

I would be destroyed.

 

It was attempting to destroy someone who was

seemingly weak.

 

Again, this was pursuit of harm.

Behind my back, when I was helpless.

 

 

------------

 

 

I will stop writing.

 

 

I only write because. I am completely blind.

 

 

I only feel that I have been violated in many different ways.

 

 

And in all fairness, I have done nothing to deserve this.